| Chapter Meeting,
April 18
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack NJ.
Dr. Richard Winters
Kathie Belonger introduced our speaker, Dr. Richard M. Winters, medical
director of Hackensack’s recently opened Center for Facial Nerve
Disorders and Facial Reanimation. Dr. Winter’s topic for the meeting
was “Facial Restoration and Reanimation in Patients with Facial
Paralysis.” He presented a very thorough and well illustrated coverage
of the types of surgical procedures he has performed at the Center for
acoustic neuroma and other patients having facial palsy. He traced the
muscles of facial expression and showed how the surgeon can go about repairing
problems with the eyes or mouth, even adding a cosmetic touch here and
there. He described some procedures as fairly straightforward (e.g., fixing
eye droop, mouth droop, lip muscle weakness), whereas facial reanimation
involving complex nerve structures and muscle attachment is more challenging.
For cases of facial paralysis following AN surgery, even deciding whether
to operate or wait for spontaneous recovery can be problematic. People
recover at different rates. What is the extent of nerve damage? Will the
nerve regrow? Will the muscle be receptive or has it been too badly damaged?
Dr. Winters gave examples of a cross facial nerve graft and a muscle transfer
procedure. He observed that the type of surgery done at the Center is
not at the same level of risk to the patient as an intercranial AN resection.
Still, he felt that the age,expectations and medical history of the patient
always need to be considered carefully. Not all procedures are completely
successful and the trauma involved may not be worth the final result for
older patients. During the question and answer period following the presentation,
Dr. Winters noted that insurance routinely covers the types of surgery
he performs. He said he is not a big fan of electrical stimulation therapy.
He said there is little that can be done for cases of synkinesis, uncoordinated
facial movements (e.g., a smile may cause eye closure), which is possibly
caused by abnormal nerve regeneration.
Before joining the medical staff at Hackensack in 1998, Dr. Winters
completed a residency at New York Hospital/Cornell Medical Center and
then continued his training at the Buncke Clinic in San Francisco. He
worked there for one year alongside Dr.Harry Buncke, who is regarded as
one of the pioneers in microsurgery and facial reanimation surgery.
“The strongest have their moments of fatigue.”
Nietzsche ~
Article on Fatigue
Many thanks to all those who emailed or phoned in response to our request
for information about personal experiences with post-treatement fatigue.
The article below, “Acoustic Neuroma and Fatigue,” was strengthened
greatly by reference to these specific accounts.
Auditory Brainstem Implant Update
In the Sept 2001 issue of our newsletter, Dr. Jed Kwartler (Ear Specialty
Group) described “Auditory Brainstem Implant Surgery for NF2 Patients.”
He noted that ABI involves major surgery and is not for AN patients having
unilateral hearing loss. ABI was developed primarily for NF2 patients
whose auditory nerves have been destroyed by bilateral tumors. The implant
is placed on the cochlear nucleus portion of the brain-stem so that sound
can be sent directly to the brain, bypassing the inner ear and auditory
nerve. Since FDA approval in 2000, the ABI has been implanted in more
than 300 patients world-wide. And now - Press Release, Jan 2004 - the
House Ear Institute has announced the creation of an improved device,
the Penetrating Electrode Auditory Brainstem Implant (PABI). The PABI,
which is designed to provide greater speech recog-nition and comprehension
of more environmental sounds, has been successfully implanted in two patients
by HEI surgeons Dr. William Hitselberger and Dr. Derald Brackmann. One
patient said soon after her device was activated: “I’m hearing
paper crinkling, doors closing, and voices - I can tell when someone is
speaking. I can’t wait to hear my childrens’ voices.”
Commenting on HEI’s achievement, Dr. Kwartler has said: “The
idea for the penetrating electrodes in the PABI flows from the idea that
if discrete areas within the cochlear nucleus can be stimulated, then
hearing quality will be better. This advance is analogous to advances
in electrode design in cochlear implants. We will, of course, continue
to provide im-plant services here in New Jersey and incorporate this new
design once it is fully approved.”
Notices
¨The Hackensack University Medical Center has announced the opening
of its Center for Facial Nerve Disorders and Facial Reanimation. The center
will provide comprehensive services for patients who have experienced
facial paralysis due to a disorder of the facial nerve. The medical director
of the center is Dr. Richard M. Winters, a plastic/reconstructive surgeon
on the staff at Hackensack since 1998. Dr. Winters did residency at NYHospital/Cornell
Medical Center in NYCity and completed a fellowship in reconstructive
microsurgery at the Buncke Clinic in San Francisco. For further information,
call the center at 201-996-5588 and see Hackensack’s website at
www.humed.com.
¨Dr. Fred Evans, who is a member of ANA/NJ’s Medical Advisory
Board, was speaker at the Berks County ANA Chapter meeting held at Reading
Hospital, October 25, 2003. His topic was “Sleep, Fatigue and Memory
Problems in Chronic Illness.”
Dr. Scott Kay in the Spotlight
Dr. Scott Kay
Interview by Kristin Ingersoll
Dr. Scott Kay may well have had a different career in a different place
were it not for the role of chance. Some might call it fate. Already a
married man with two small children he headed for Miami to do a fellowship
in Cosmetic Plastic Surgery. Upon his arrival he discovered that the doctor
he was to work with had experienced an accident that left him with no
sensation in his hand. As a surgeon, he could no longer practice and decided
to retire. Dr.Kay returned to the Philadelphia area and decided to look
for a job. Around the same time, the Fellow expected by Dr.Mark May, a
renowned Otololaryngologist and pioneer in facial nerve reanimation at
Shadyside Hospital in Pittsburgh, also had an accident and had to withdraw.
Dr.May reached out to Dr.Kay to fill the fellowship. Doing so turned out
to be a life-altering event for Dr.Kay. In a sense, it changed not only
what he did, but also who he was. Among other things, it was here that
Scott Kay came to understand the devastating impact that facial paralysis
had on people and to learn about the options and limitations of what could
be done for them. Some of those affected were acoustic neuroma patients.
Scott Kay always wanted to be a doctor, although he thinks his earliest
ambitions may have involved becoming a Veterinarian. He was a serious
student and enjoyed school, particularly Biology. He grew up outside Philadelphia
with his parents and sister. As a boy he saw his grand-father very sick
with cancer. This may have impacted his interest in medicine but he knows
he always wanted to help people. Being naturally competitive, he felt
the need to strive beyond being an Internist and admits initially being
attracted to the glamour of cosmetic surgery. The artistic aspect also
appealed to him. After completing his fellowship in Pittsburgh, Dr.Kay
settled with his family in Princeton joining Princeton Otolaryngology
Association where he specializes in facial and reconstructive surgery,
head and neck surgery, otology, laser surgery and Maxillo-facial trauma.
Among the procedures he performs are nerve grafts to reenervate paralyzed
faces as well as procedures to protect the eye such as the insertion of
gold weights.
Scott Kay is in a reflective place in his life, contemplating the choices
he’s made and the direction his life has taken. He also thinks about
the type of society we live in where Plastic Surgery has become entertainment
on prime time TV. He finds that as time goes by he questions the pressure
people feel to achieve a standard of beauty and feels increasingly accepting
of differences from that accepted ideal. He no longer looks at people
as he did in the early years, thinking how he might improve them.
The one thing Dr.Kay is crystal clear about is that his kids are the
best things he ever did. He thinks fondly of their early years although
the budget was tight and they didn’t have a lot of material things.
Mitchell is now 15 years old and Melissa is 13 and they are strikingly
good looking children. Dr.Kay also says he likes what he does and he especially
likes getting to know his patients. Since he works and lives in the same
community, he sees the fruits of his efforts when he is at the gym or
on the street. He is confident in his skills and experience, but as in
his early days at school he prepares in advance for each procedure. It’s
not hard to imagine how Scott Kay engages his patients as he easily shifted
from subject to questioner during our interview, naturally assuming the
role of listener and teacher. He says he feels close to his patients and
it’s easy to understand why.
Currently Dr.Kay is training for his annual charity 500-mile bike ride,
which will take place from July 10th-17th. They will ride from Burlington,
VT to Princeton, NJ, raising money for Anchor House Foundation. The money
raised (last year $400,000) sustains the programs and shelter for children.
For more information, check out www.anchorhouseride.org, or call 609-278-9495.
Dr.Kay is an enthusiastic cyclist and enjoys the camaraderie of group
rides. Many of the same people ride year after year and have formed a
sort of community.
Dr.Kay is a member of ANA/NJ’s Medical Advisory Board and gave
an informative presentation on “Tinnitus” at the October 2002
ANA/NJ Conference. He discussed the various causes of tinnitus and treatment
options. He also provided information regarding accessing some of those
treatments, as well as Internet information. He suggested possible life
style changes that might reduce the severity or response to tinnitus,
including getting adequate sleep, stress reduction, dietary and medication
changes. Between his medical practice and his bicycle training, Dr.Kay
admits he has little time for other things. With his annual bike ride
just around the corner, training rides are consuming increasing amounts
of time. When not on the road with his bicycle, he is “spinning”
at the gym. He seems eager to see what the future has in store for him
and is open to the changes that will inevitably lie ahead.
Acoustic Neuroma and Fatigue
I. What is the incidence of fatigue as a post-treatment
problem for acoustic neuroma patients?
In the 1998 ANA Survey, fatigue ranked sixth in the main listing of fifteen
basic “long-term problems”, coming only after hearing loss,
eye problems, balance dis-turbance, tinnitus and facial weakness, in that
order (Table 4). For microsurgery, 30% of patients (447 out of 1,469)
reported fatigue as a long-term problem following treatment. For the small
number of radio-surgery patients reporting, 13% (7 of 55) cited fatigue
as a problem. The Survey was unable to determine exactly how long fatigue
lasted, but it was reported to be a “permanent difficulty”
by 30% of the total number of responders (Table 6). A lower incidence
of fatigue was reported by patients over age 60, and fewer men than women
cited it as a post-treatment problem.
In the 1998 University of Pittsburgh report on long-term outcomes after
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma, Table 3 listed complications
described by 36 of 115 patients. Balance problems headed the list (7 patients,
6%). No patient described fatigue as a problem.
A recent survey from Denmark has looked at the long-term impact of surgery
for 716 acoustic neuroma patients for the period 1976-2000. The patients
responded to a questionnaire at a median of 11.5 years after surgery.
They were asked to consider carefully whether the operation was the true
reason for any changes they experienced subsequently. For 400 patients
with tumor size >2.0cm, fatigue in the years after surgery was reported
as follows:
Fatigue No. %
Better 14 4
Unchanged 142 41
A little worse 119 34
Much worse 70 20
No answer 55 14
For the 316 patients whose tumor size was <2.0cm, the distribution
was very similar.
The study also compared 225 patients who opted for wait-and-watch following
their diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Interestingly, while 66% said their
fatigue was unchanged during the observation period (a median of 3.4 years
after diagnosis), 27% said it was “a little worse” and 13%
said it was “much worse.”
Our own ANA/NJ records provide another glimpse at the incidence of fatigue.
For the 125 surgery patients listed in our Directory, 19 (15%) have reported
varying degrees of fatigue as a post-treatment problem. This low figure
is a bit suspect, however; fatigue is most likely underreported in the
Directory since many patients tend to view it as a normal, expected outcome
not needing mention. For radiosurgery (Gamma Knife) and radiotherapy (Linac,
FSR), two out of a total of 22 patients reported fatigue: one case (FSR)
was said to be quite severe, occurring about 6 weeks after treatment and
lasting 6-8 weeks, while the second involving Gamma Knife was recalled
as moderate and short-term.
II. How is fatigue defined and what are some examples
for acoustic neuroma?
Fatigue is a persistent feeling of listlessness and lack of energy.
It’s a tiredness not related to physical activity; in fact, one
of its main characteristics is reduced motivation and capacity for physical
and/or mental activity. Rest or sleep never fully relieve the condition.
As one patient has said: “no matter how much sleep, or vacation,
or relaxation, there is always that heaviness and lack of energy.”
Fatigue of this type is a common experience of brain tumor patients. It
can seriously affect emotional well-being, social ability and quality
of life in general.
As a general rule, radiosurgery patients do not describe this type of
fatigue as a post-treatment problem. And fortunately, too, probably the
majority of AN patients who undergo microsurgery will experience such
fatigue for only a relatively brief period following treatment. That is,
for a time there is a dramatic decrease in energy because of the emotional
impact of the diagnosis and the trauma of anesthesia and a long surgery,
but usually within 3-4 months the patient “bounces back” and
resumes normal activity. As one ANA/NJ member recalls: “By the beginning
of the third month I was driving myself to work and did not experience
the fatigue symptoms anymore.” Other surgery patients, however,
may continue to feel a profound tiredness lasting for as much as 1 to
5 years or longer. One patient remembers: “Just coming home from
the hospital fatigued me terribly. I went right to bed for a nap, and
I took a daily nap for 3 months afterwards. . . All I wanted to do was
sleep and read and sleep some more! [One year after surgery] marked the
time when I was starting to feel normal again.” Another writes:
“Recovering from surgery is the first time that I recall being fatigued
on a regular basis. . . My surgery was in July 2001 and fatigue is still
a constant problem. . . I’ve tried vitamins, a healthy diet and
a regular exercise program but the fatigue continued.” A third patient
reports: “My surgery was in 1997 . . . and it took about 5 years
before I felt that my fatigue had completely gone. Three of those first
5 years I had debilitating headaches every day. . . Sleeping did not relieve
the fatigue because I had trouble sleeping. . . Also I was being treated
for depression [and the medications caused fatigue]. . .It took my body
much longer than the milestones that the [doctors] set - i.e., “Go
back to work after 12-14 weeks; one year for recovery.” Most unfortunately,
one patient reports that her fatigue has lasted for 25 years. She writes
that she is still able to distinguish this AN-related fatigue “as
a ‘heavy-head’ type of sensation as opposed to physical fatigue.
[It’s] an inability to think sharply [and] keep my mind focused.”
III. What are the causes of fatigue for acoustic
neuroma patients?
Some of our members report having had years of pre-treatment fatigue,
which points to the tumor itself as the root cause of the problem. We
know that as an acoustic neuroma grows it presses on nerves and vital
structures such as the brainstem. As a consequence, the body is forced
to expend energy adjusting to hearing, balance and other difficulties
that we know as the symptoms of AN. For some patients, for example, the
tinnitus symptom can result in serious sleep problems, stress and irritability
- all leading to fatigue. The National Cancer Institute notes that a tumor
can also cause fatigue directly by forming toxic substances in the body
that interfere with normal cell functions. For example, TNF (tumor necrosis
factor) can be produced by a tumor and cause a decrease in protein stores
in muscles, which forces the body to work harder to perform normal functions.
Researchers are currently looking at how the body’s own immune system
chemicals, notably cytokines, may act to cause fatigue. In sum, an acoustic
neuroma can act as an energy drain even before its presence is diagnosed.
Since the tumor itself is identifiable as the culprit, it follows that
its surgical removal, or radiation to stop its growth, should take care
of the problem of fatigue once and for all. Why then, as described earlier,
are some AN patients plagued by fatigue for many years following treatment?
For this we need to look no further than to the act of surgery itself
and its potential for unintended complications. Consider some of the highlights
of acoustic neuroma surgery, including: a very long surgery under general
anesthesia, the opening of the skull, muscle incisions, bone dust accrual
from drilling to expose the tumor for removal, sensitive nerves and vital
structures placed in jeopardy, closure of the skull. Even under the best
of conditions, things can happen in this surgical arena to cause troublesome
post-treatment problems. Indeed, the very integrity of the brain and its
complex, bilateral circuitry has been tampered with and abused. We are
reminded of that wide-ranging list of post-treatment problems reported
in the 1998 ANA Survey: hearing, balance disturbance, eye problems, tinnitus,
facial weakness or numbness, fatigue, memory, concentration, headache,
smell, speech, swallowing, depression, sleep. Persistent fatigue could
be explained in terms of the essential time and energy needed for the
brain to try to repair itself following a serious surgical trauma. But
most patients explain their fatigue as part of a continuing nexus of interrelated
postop problems. One patient speaks of how a combination of “loss
of hearing, vertigo from the vestibular nerve resection, and tinnitus”
all drain her energy in “an exhausting series of compensations.”
Another patient says: “I always try so hard to hear, to concentrate
and to stay upright, that I exhaust myself.” Or again, chronic pain
due to headache (one patient is ready to blame the retrosigmoid approach
for this) figures importantly in numerous patient explanations. Depression
and fatigue due to self-consciousness over facial weakness is another
connection being made. Anti-depressants and pain medications, patients
report, often add to the fatigue.
Dr. Wendy Harpham at the Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, gives us
another example of the interconnectedness of things. “Fatigue,”
she writes, “can trigger a cascade of practical, social, financial,
and emotional problems that interfere with patients’ functioning
and resting, and which, in turn, exacerbate the fatigue, dampen patients’
outlook, and worsen anxiety and depression - all of which can exacerbate
fatigue.” (See “Resolving the Frustration of Fatigue,”
CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol.49, 1999)
AN patients observe how life experiences over the long term can sometimes
confuse their perception of fatigue. Five years after treatment, one patient’s
AN-related fatigue was figuratively trumped by the severe pain, depression
and fatigue of fibromyalgia. Cases of hypothyroidism have also muddied
the waters for some. And one patient observes how, a decade after treatment,
“it’s hard to tell [whether] fatigue, anger, or depression
are related to the surgery or just part of life.” Still, the causative
link to surgery remains. Physicians at treating centers for acoustic neuroma
are beginning to recognize the need to address fatigue as an important
Quality of Life issue.
Editor’s note: Part IV, How can
I cope with long-term fatigue? will appear in the next issue of the newsletter.
Please email or phone Dick Barker if you would like to contribute information
for Part IV or if you would like to make an observation on any part of
the article. All communications will be appreciated.
Please indicate whether or not you can be quoted for the newsletter. Names
will not be used.
Making a Medical Decision
Dr. Cole Giller’s book, Port in the Storm: How to Make a Medical Decision
and Live to Tell about It (LifeLine Press, 2004), was inspired by the author’s
years of experience as a neurosurgeon counseling acoustic neuroma patients.
He saw the need for a practical and compassionate guidebook to help anxious
patients choose between the growing number of treatment options made available
by modern medical science. For Dr. Giller, who is an associate professor
of neurosurgery at Southwestern Medical School in Dallas, Texas, the decision-making
process in- volves more than gathering medical information, although he
shows how to do this very well. “More importantly,” he says,
“our decisions must also consider our wishes, needs, expectations
and fears. Simply knowing about a disease and its treatments does not tell
you which of these treatments will make you happy.” “Decisions
come to the prepared mind,” Dr.Giller emphasizes. And for this essential
preparation he offers a six-step plan:
Identification of Options - types of treatment available, where, and by
whom;
Identification of Tradeoffs - the pros and cons of each available treatment;
Discovery of Data - gathering reliable medical information;
Interpretation of Numbers - being skeptical and checking out conflicting
claims;
Gathering your Beliefs - trying to keep an open mind;
Contemplation of Meaning - weighing the potential consequences of your choice.
Dr.Giller’s discussion of these six steps comprises the main body
of the book. For Step 3, he provides excellent advice on using the Internet
and how to read medical books and articles. And don’t forget the
doctor, he advises. “Your doctors are some of the most important
sources of inform-ation around. Use them to gather data, use them to seek
perspective, and use them to test your ideas and plans.”
The final chapters of the book treat such topics as Managing your Doctor,
When Doctors Disagree Deciding for Children, Choosing to do Nothing, and
Changing your Mind. One feature of the book that needs to be reconsidered
is its very strange subtitle. More in keeping with the book’s main
message would have been: “How to Make a Medical Decision You Can
Live With.”
(Note: The
next regular chapter meeting is tentatively scheduled for October 10 at
Overlook Hospital. Details will appear in the September 2004 newsletter.)
|